Mobile Phone Reviews, User Opinions & More

Find Your Phone!

blogger

Thursday, March 26, 2015

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro Specification, Price and Review

Let's see the Specification of Xiaomi Mi Note Pro

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro Price:

31500 Indian Rupee Approx.

504 US Dollar Approx.

460 EUR Approx.

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro reviews:

User Opinion 1:

I agree with all the people who say that this phone is great, but don't forget that it is a Xiaomi phone and that means that it runs on MIUI Android, people have to like MIUI to be able to like Note Pro otherwise and I'm not one of those people, when you use MIUI you are limited to what is made available by Xiaomi but with Android running for example under Samsung's TouchWiz you have a lot of freedom that you would never have with MIUI.
Well that's my two cents on this matter.

User Opinion 2:

I think this device is pretty great...
you know why...
because it contain nearly all types of flagship specifications like Next generation processor,
better quality ram (DDR4),
body like apples iPhone covered with gorilla glass so that will be scratched resistant and your phone will look newer for many years,
better camera with optical image stabilization, better graphics (compared to samsung note 4, nexus 6 etc.),
better connectivity LTE cat 9 which will give you speed upto 450mbps (note 4 speed upto 300) and
many more if you search these features in smasung, LG, HTC like smartphones it will definitely cost you more then 50k but Xiaomi offering you for only 32k... just think about it....

User Opinion 3:

All Mi Note series using IMX-214 Exmor RS from Sony specialize in 13MP camera (announced around April 2014). Not too outdated i think, only 1 years old. And IMX214 still the best sensor from Sony todate for 13MP camera. There is no way Mi4 using IMX230 which only used in Xperia Z Series with 20MP Camera. S6 use Sony brand new IMX240 Exmor RS from Sony for their 16MP camera.

Different resolution = different sensor. take note that. Even its outdated there is no way vendor will use a thing that not even match their spec.

User Opinion 4:

I recommend you not to compare Chinese OEMs with reputable OEMs. The main intention of those Chinese OEMs is, release high-end specs phones with an impressive price. So they can attract more buyers. In reality, Xioami earns more profit than Samsung. 90% of their sales come from their home country and India.

Also, having a 4GB RAM is not an advantage over a 3GB RAM. No phone in the world consumes RAM more than 3GB. The Note 4 consumes maximum 2 - 2.5GB of RAM. Most of the upcoming phones such as the Galaxy S6 and M9 will have DDR4 RAMs. It will blow the current DDR3 RAMs in bandwidth and efficiency.

The main advantage of those Chinese phones is, you can own a high-end device with an affordable price. It's more beneficial than buying a mid-range reputable brand phone for the same price. Except that, Xiaomi is very poor in after sales service, Android updates and firmware updates to fix the bugs. In simple, their after sales service is very poor. They can't attract buyers in western countries until they improve their after sales service.

User Opinion 5:

Not bad as phones go. Why is everyone So upset about not having infra red. The Samsung Note 3 uses infra red just so you can use the handset as remote control. There are no settings for the infra red as it doesn't support anything else. Unlike early mobiles before bluetooth they had infra red modems. These were used in much the same way has bluetooth. Bluetooth won over infra red as it was more stable and reliable. So it's nothing new.

Source: gsmarena.com

Get your Phone from Flipkart!

Share this post
  • Share to Facebook
  • Share to Twitter
  • Share to Google+
  • Share to Stumble Upon
  • Share to Evernote
  • Share to Blogger
  • Share to Email
  • Share to Yahoo Messenger
  • More...

0 comments

:) :-) :)) =)) :( :-( :(( :d :-d @-) :p :o :>) (o) [-( :-? (p) :-s (m) 8-) :-t :-b b-( :-# =p~ :-$ (b) (f) x-) (k) (h) (c) cheer

 
© PhoneOpinion
Designed by BlogThietKe Cooperated with Duy Pham
Released under Creative Commons 3.0 CC BY-NC 3.0
Posts RSSComments RSS
Back to top